XTKG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ryde Group has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of --. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Ryde Group's return on equity of --.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5145702.74%. On the other hand Ryde Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 353.19%. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Ryde Group, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Ryde Group.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryde Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryde Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ryde Group quarterly revenues of --. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Ryde Group's net income of --. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryde Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.44x versus 1.36x for Ryde Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saiheat has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of --. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Saiheat's return on equity of -25.64%.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5145702.74%. On the other hand Saiheat has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Saiheat, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Saiheat.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saiheat has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Saiheat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Saiheat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Saiheat quarterly revenues of --. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Saiheat's net income of --. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Saiheat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.44x versus 2.55x for Saiheat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trident Digital Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of --. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Trident Digital Tech Holdings's return on equity of --.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5145702.74%. On the other hand Trident Digital Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Trident Digital Tech Holdings, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Trident Digital Tech Holdings.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trident Digital Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trident Digital Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trident Digital Tech Holdings pays out -1.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trident Digital Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Trident Digital Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trident Digital Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.44x versus 99.56x for Trident Digital Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trio-Tech International has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of -2.41%. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.85%.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5145702.74%. On the other hand Trio-Tech International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trio-Tech International has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.92%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trio-Tech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trio-Tech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues of $9.8M. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Trio-Tech International's net income of -$236K. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trio-Tech International's PE ratio is 47.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.44x versus 0.63x for Trio-Tech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.