WDFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of 7.16%. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.98%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 47.77%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.034, which suggesting that the stock is 96.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.662%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.72x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 5.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 4.84x versus 0.69x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.98%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 257.14%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.034, which suggesting that the stock is 96.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.72x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 4.84x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of -2.54%. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.98%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $41.65 which suggests that it could fall by -0.41%. Given that WD-40 has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe WD-40 is more attractive than United States Steel.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.034, which suggesting that the stock is 96.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.2%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.5B. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$89M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.72x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 28.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 4.84x versus 0.68x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 20.43% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 37.54% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of $296.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.98%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 130.73%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of 0.034, which suggesting that the stock is 96.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $146.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $29.9M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.72x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 4.84x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.