VSEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conrad Industries has a net margin of 4.26% compared to VSE's net margin of --. VSE's return on equity of 2.03% beat Conrad Industries's return on equity of --.

VSE has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.38%. On the other hand Conrad Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.67%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Conrad Industries, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Conrad Industries.

VSE has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conrad Industries has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.07%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Conrad Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VSE pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Conrad Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $273.6M, which are larger than Conrad Industries quarterly revenues of --. VSE's net income of $11.7M is higher than Conrad Industries's net income of --. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Conrad Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.63x versus 0.31x for Conrad Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 4.26% compared to VSE's net margin of 13.91%. VSE's return on equity of 2.03% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.18%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.38%. On the other hand Curtiss-Wright has an analysts' consensus of $267.83 which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

VSE has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.088%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Curtiss-Wright offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. VSE pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $273.6M, which are smaller than Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues of $798.9M. VSE's net income of $11.7M is lower than Curtiss-Wright's net income of $111.2M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Curtiss-Wright's PE ratio is 33.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.63x versus 4.44x for Curtiss-Wright. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 4.26% compared to VSE's net margin of 3.88%. VSE's return on equity of 2.03% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.28%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.38%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.83%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

VSE has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.333%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. VSE pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 229.78% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sturm Ruger &'s is not.

VSE quarterly revenues are $273.6M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $122.3M. VSE's net income of $11.7M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $4.7M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 20.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.63x versus 1.17x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 4.26% compared to VSE's net margin of 1.39%. VSE's return on equity of 2.03% beat V2X's return on equity of 0.92%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $135.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.38%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $69.88 which suggests that it could grow by 44.25%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than VSE.

VSE has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.289% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.389%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VSE pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $273.6M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1.1B. VSE's net income of $11.7M is lower than V2X's net income of $15.1M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.39x while V2X's PE ratio is 173.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.63x versus 0.36x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.