ULBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Energy Industries has a net margin of 0.72% compared to Ultralife's net margin of 11.77%. Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98% beat Advanced Energy Industries's return on equity of 4.66%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.91%. On the other hand Advanced Energy Industries has an analysts' consensus of $128.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.42%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Advanced Energy Industries, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Advanced Energy Industries.

Ultralife has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Energy Industries has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.101%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Energy Industries offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries pays out 28.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are smaller than Advanced Energy Industries quarterly revenues of $415.4M. Ultralife's net income of $258K is lower than Advanced Energy Industries's net income of $48.9M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Advanced Energy Industries's PE ratio is 74.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.57x versus 2.70x for Advanced Energy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enovix has a net margin of 0.72% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -385.56%. Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98% beat Enovix's return on equity of -102.33%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.91%. On the other hand Enovix has an analysts' consensus of $27.08 which suggests that it could grow by 240.24%. Given that Enovix has higher upside potential than Ultralife, analysts believe Enovix is more attractive than Ultralife.

Ultralife has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enovix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enovix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enovix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are larger than Enovix quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Ultralife's net income of $258K is higher than Enovix's net income of -$37.5M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Enovix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.57x versus 60.40x for Enovix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of 0.72% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -47998.78%. Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -57.04%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.91%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 181.13%. Given that Ideal Power has higher upside potential than Ultralife, analysts believe Ideal Power is more attractive than Ultralife.

Ultralife has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.655%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $5.4K. Ultralife's net income of $258K is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.57x versus 472.43x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 0.72% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -697.46%. Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.91%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.33 which suggests that it could grow by 46.51%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Plug Power.

Ultralife has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.981, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.137%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Ultralife's net income of $258K is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.57x versus 1.98x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.