UGRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agrify has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -964.37%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Agrify's return on equity of --.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $3.57, signalling upside risk potential of 374.92%. On the other hand Agrify has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3996.49%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.718, which suggesting that the stock is 71.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agrify has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agrify offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agrify pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Agrify quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Agrify's net income of -$18.7M. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agrify's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.15x versus 2.07x for Agrify. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of 13.48%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of 2.68%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $3.57, signalling upside risk potential of 374.92%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 319.16%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Art's-Way Manufacturing, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Art's-Way Manufacturing.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.718, which suggesting that the stock is 71.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.448, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.193%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of $831.9K. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 33.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.15x versus 0.34x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -189.45%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $3.57, signalling upside risk potential of 374.92%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.718, which suggesting that the stock is 71.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.587%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.15x versus 2.15x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -46.93%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -25.85%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of $3.57, signalling upside risk potential of 374.92%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 130.26%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.718, which suggesting that the stock is 71.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.15x versus 0.07x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.