TURN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Discover Financial Services has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of 27.13%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Discover Financial Services's return on equity of 28.32%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Discover Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $211.77 which suggests that it could grow by 33%. Given that Discover Financial Services has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Discover Financial Services is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Discover Financial Services has a beta of 1.456, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.588%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Discover Financial Services offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Discover Financial Services pays out 17% of its earnings as a dividend. Discover Financial Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Discover Financial Services quarterly revenues of $4.8B. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Discover Financial Services's net income of $1.3B. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Discover Financial Services's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 108.65x versus 2.23x for Discover Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Financial Gravity Companies has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of --. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Financial Gravity Companies's return on equity of --.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Financial Gravity Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 180 Degree Capital has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Companies, analysts believe 180 Degree Capital is more attractive than Financial Gravity Companies.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Financial Gravity Companies has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.5%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Financial Gravity Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Financial Gravity Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Financial Gravity Companies quarterly revenues of --. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Financial Gravity Companies's net income of --. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Financial Gravity Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 108.65x versus 2.31x for Financial Gravity Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of 23.24%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 16.33%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $117.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.76%. Given that Northern Trust has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Northern Trust is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.526%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 31.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $455.4M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 108.65x versus 2.34x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of 2.87%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -34.49%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $66.57 which suggests that it could grow by 43.04%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 2.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.899%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $261.5M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than LendingTree's net income of $7.5M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 108.65x versus 0.69x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.