THRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -0.64%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.12% beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.24%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $45.80, signalling upside risk potential of 57.39%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 62.52%. Given that Standard Motor Products has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Standard Motor Products is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.552%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $352.9M, which are larger than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $343.4M. Gentherm's net income of $15.3M is higher than Standard Motor Products's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.63x versus 0.38x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stoneridge has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -2.8%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.12% beat Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.11%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $45.80, signalling upside risk potential of 57.39%. On the other hand Stoneridge has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 202.38%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stoneridge has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.219%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stoneridge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stoneridge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $352.9M, which are larger than Stoneridge quarterly revenues of $218.2M. Gentherm's net income of $15.3M is higher than Stoneridge's net income of -$6.1M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Stoneridge's PE ratio is 204.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.63x versus 0.14x for Stoneridge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Gentherm's net margin of 9.17%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.12% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $45.80, signalling upside risk potential of 57.39%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $330.38 which suggests that it could grow by 21.63%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Tesla.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $352.9M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Gentherm's net income of $15.3M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Tesla's PE ratio is 133.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.63x versus 9.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -207.1%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.12% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -42.3%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $45.80, signalling upside risk potential of 57.39%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2185.71%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $352.9M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Gentherm's net income of $15.3M is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.06x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.63x versus 0.24x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.