TFIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community West Bancshares has a net margin of 5.05% compared to Triumph Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Triumph Financial's return on equity of 2.52% beat Community West Bancshares's return on equity of 2.54%.

Triumph Financial has a consensus price target of $89.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.18%. On the other hand Community West Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $23.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.99%. Given that Community West Bancshares has higher upside potential than Triumph Financial, analysts believe Community West Bancshares is more attractive than Triumph Financial.

Triumph Financial has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community West Bancshares has a beta of 0.905, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.52%.

Triumph Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Community West Bancshares offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Triumph Financial pays 7.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Community West Bancshares pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Triumph Financial quarterly revenues are $106M, which are larger than Community West Bancshares quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Triumph Financial's net income of $5.3M is higher than Community West Bancshares's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Triumph Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.85x while Community West Bancshares's PE ratio is 29.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Financial is 5.24x versus 2.92x for Community West Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 5.05% compared to Triumph Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Triumph Financial's return on equity of 2.52% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Triumph Financial has a consensus price target of $89.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.18%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Triumph Financial, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Triumph Financial.

Triumph Financial has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Triumph Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Triumph Financial pays 7.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Triumph Financial quarterly revenues are $106M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Triumph Financial's net income of $5.3M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Triumph Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.85x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Financial is 5.24x versus 2.92x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 5.05% compared to Triumph Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Triumph Financial's return on equity of 2.52% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Triumph Financial has a consensus price target of $89.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.18%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Triumph Financial, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Triumph Financial.

Triumph Financial has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Triumph Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Triumph Financial pays 7.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Triumph Financial quarterly revenues are $106M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Triumph Financial's net income of $5.3M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Triumph Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.85x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Financial is 5.24x versus 5.75x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 5.05% compared to Triumph Financial's net margin of 24.66%. Triumph Financial's return on equity of 2.52% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Triumph Financial has a consensus price target of $89.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.18%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.93%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Triumph Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Triumph Financial.

Triumph Financial has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Triumph Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Triumph Financial pays 7.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Triumph Financial quarterly revenues are $106M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Triumph Financial's net income of $5.3M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Triumph Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.85x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Financial is 5.24x versus 3.41x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.