TATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of 7.08% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of 4.61%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.17%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.441%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.7B. TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 44.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.89x versus 1.77x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of 7.08% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of -1.79%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -5.27%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.28%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than Kornit Digital, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than Kornit Digital.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.446%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$908K. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.89x versus 7.67x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of 7.08% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of --. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53% beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 804.86%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M is higher than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.89x versus -- for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of 7.08% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of --. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53% beat SuperCom's return on equity of --.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 223.45%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.195%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M is higher than SuperCom's net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.66x while SuperCom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.89x versus 0.12x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.