TATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of 8.71% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of 4.66%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 11.17% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 10.47%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $358.73 which suggests that it could fall by -7.53%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 0.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.884%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 27.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $41M, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.9B. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.6M is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $90M. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.92x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 54.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 2.02x versus 2.54x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of 8.71% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of 3.65%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 11.17% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -2.16%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 71.8%. Given that Kornit Digital has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Kornit Digital is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 0.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.533%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $41M, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $60.7M. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.6M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of $2.2M. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.92x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 2.02x versus 4.54x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of 8.71% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of --. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 11.17% beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1567.06%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 0.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $41M, which are larger than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.6M is higher than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.92x while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 2.02x versus -- for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of 8.71% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of --. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 11.17% beat SuperCom's return on equity of --.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 146.58%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 0.961% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.095%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $41M, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.6M is higher than SuperCom's net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.92x while SuperCom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 2.02x versus 0.23x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.