SSYS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -19.01% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -24.46%. Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -49.92%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.22%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.414%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $140M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $336.9M. Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$82.4M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 4.18x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of -19.01% compared to Stratasys's net margin of 28.51%. Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.24%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 33.89%. Given that Qualcomm has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Qualcomm is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.479%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $140M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 17.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 4.44x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -19.01% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -868.86%. Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.7%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.291%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $140M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 45.75x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -19.01% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -623.76%. Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -51.99%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could fall by -62.84%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $140M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$14.8M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 129.19x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.