SONO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Desktop Metal has a net margin of -20.79% compared to Sonos's net margin of -97.37%. Sonos's return on equity of -7.63% beat Desktop Metal's return on equity of -179.75%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $15.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand Desktop Metal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 85.19%. Given that Desktop Metal has higher upside potential than Sonos, analysts believe Desktop Metal is more attractive than Sonos.

Sonos has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Desktop Metal has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.4%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Desktop Metal offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Desktop Metal pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $255.4M, which are larger than Desktop Metal quarterly revenues of $36.4M. Sonos's net income of -$53.1M is lower than Desktop Metal's net income of -$35.4M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Desktop Metal's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 1.19x versus 0.53x for Desktop Metal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -20.79% compared to Sonos's net margin of 6.08%. Sonos's return on equity of -7.63% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $15.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.24%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Sonos, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Sonos.

Sonos has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $255.4M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Sonos's net income of -$53.1M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 1.19x versus 0.96x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -20.79% compared to Sonos's net margin of 9.02%. Sonos's return on equity of -7.63% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $15.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.81%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Sonos, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Sonos.

Sonos has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.283%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $255.4M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Sonos's net income of -$53.1M is lower than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Violet's PE ratio is 94.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 1.19x versus 6.83x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -20.79% compared to Sonos's net margin of -2.6%. Sonos's return on equity of -7.63% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Sonos has a consensus price target of $15.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.11%. Given that Sonos has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe Sonos is more attractive than Upland Software.

Sonos has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

Sonos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonos quarterly revenues are $255.4M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Sonos's net income of -$53.1M is lower than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Sonos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonos is 1.19x versus 0.43x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.