SEZL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credit Acceptance has a net margin of 22.08% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 14.5%. Sezzle's return on equity of 154.86% beat Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 11.41%.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $156.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.51%. On the other hand Credit Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of $436.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.9%. Given that Sezzle has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe Sezzle is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.99%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Credit Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Credit Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $70M, which are smaller than Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues of $543.6M. Sezzle's net income of $15.4M is lower than Credit Acceptance's net income of $78.8M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while Credit Acceptance's PE ratio is 29.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 6.61x versus 2.68x for Credit Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a net margin of 22.08% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 9.49%. Sezzle's return on equity of 154.86% beat Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 7.67%.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $156.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.51%. On the other hand Consumer Portfolio Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.01%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Sezzle, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Sezzle.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 1.981, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.052%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consumer Portfolio Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consumer Portfolio Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $70M, which are larger than Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Sezzle's net income of $15.4M is higher than Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while Consumer Portfolio Services's PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 6.61x versus 1.38x for Consumer Portfolio Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IF Bancorp has a net margin of 22.08% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 10.16%. Sezzle's return on equity of 154.86% beat IF Bancorp's return on equity of 2.68%.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $156.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.51%. On the other hand IF Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sezzle has higher upside potential than IF Bancorp, analysts believe Sezzle is more attractive than IF Bancorp.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IF Bancorp has a beta of 0.489, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.058%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IF Bancorp offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp pays out 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $70M, which are larger than IF Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Sezzle's net income of $15.4M is higher than IF Bancorp's net income of $633K. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while IF Bancorp's PE ratio is 37.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 6.61x versus 3.19x for IF Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Card Group has a net margin of 22.08% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 1.04%. Sezzle's return on equity of 154.86% beat CPI Card Group's return on equity of --.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $156.50, signalling upside risk potential of 47.51%. On the other hand CPI Card Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.36%. Given that Sezzle has higher upside potential than CPI Card Group, analysts believe Sezzle is more attractive than CPI Card Group.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Card Group has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.177%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Card Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Card Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $70M, which are smaller than CPI Card Group quarterly revenues of $124.8M. Sezzle's net income of $15.4M is higher than CPI Card Group's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while CPI Card Group's PE ratio is 23.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 6.61x versus 0.81x for CPI Card Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.