POET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canadian Solar has a net margin of -345740.49% compared to POET Technologies's net margin of -0.93%. POET Technologies's return on equity of -213.98% beat Canadian Solar's return on equity of 0.02%.

POET Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.8%. On the other hand Canadian Solar has an analysts' consensus of $16.02 which suggests that it could grow by 31.18%. Given that Canadian Solar has higher upside potential than POET Technologies, analysts believe Canadian Solar is more attractive than POET Technologies.

POET Technologies has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Solar has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.413%.

POET Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POET Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

POET Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than Canadian Solar quarterly revenues of $1.5B. POET Technologies's net income of -$12.7M is higher than Canadian Solar's net income of -$14M. Notably, POET Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canadian Solar's PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POET Technologies is -- versus 0.14x for Canadian Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -345740.49% compared to POET Technologies's net margin of 1.64%. POET Technologies's return on equity of -213.98% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.

POET Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.8%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.46%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than POET Technologies, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than POET Technologies.

POET Technologies has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.848%.

POET Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POET Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

POET Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. POET Technologies's net income of -$12.7M is lower than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, POET Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 39.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POET Technologies is -- versus 0.87x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

P2 Solar has a net margin of -345740.49% compared to POET Technologies's net margin of -434.76%. POET Technologies's return on equity of -213.98% beat P2 Solar's return on equity of --.

POET Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.8%. On the other hand P2 Solar has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that POET Technologies has higher upside potential than P2 Solar, analysts believe POET Technologies is more attractive than P2 Solar.

POET Technologies has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison P2 Solar has a beta of 11.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1084.937%.

POET Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. P2 Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POET Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. P2 Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

POET Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than P2 Solar quarterly revenues of $7.4K. POET Technologies's net income of -$12.7M is lower than P2 Solar's net income of -$32K. Notably, POET Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while P2 Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POET Technologies is -- versus 3.45x for P2 Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siyata Mobile has a net margin of -345740.49% compared to POET Technologies's net margin of -10.68%. POET Technologies's return on equity of -213.98% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.

POET Technologies has a consensus price target of $6.29, signalling upside risk potential of 24.8%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16822.06%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than POET Technologies, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than POET Technologies.

POET Technologies has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.535%.

POET Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. POET Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

POET Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.7K, which are smaller than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. POET Technologies's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, POET Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for POET Technologies is -- versus 0.44x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.