PLL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Freeport-McMoRan has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of 7.75%. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 7.17%.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $22.92, signalling upside risk potential of 161.91%. On the other hand Freeport-McMoRan has an analysts' consensus of $54.48 which suggests that it could grow by 36.17%. Given that Piedmont Lithium has higher upside potential than Freeport-McMoRan, analysts believe Piedmont Lithium is more attractive than Freeport-McMoRan.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.047%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freeport-McMoRan offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 46.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than Freeport-McMoRan quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is lower than Freeport-McMoRan's net income of $526M. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freeport-McMoRan's PE ratio is 28.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.60x versus 2.19x for Freeport-McMoRan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ivanhoe Electric has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of -6443.52%. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -57.41%.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $22.92, signalling upside risk potential of 161.91%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Electric has an analysts' consensus of $16.80 which suggests that it could grow by 135.13%. Given that Piedmont Lithium has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Electric, analysts believe Piedmont Lithium is more attractive than Ivanhoe Electric.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are larger than Ivanhoe Electric quarterly revenues of $671K. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is higher than Ivanhoe Electric's net income of -$43.2M. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.60x versus 267.71x for Ivanhoe Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MP Materials has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of -40.55%. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat MP Materials's return on equity of -4.9%.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $22.92, signalling upside risk potential of 161.91%. On the other hand MP Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.78%. Given that Piedmont Lithium has higher upside potential than MP Materials, analysts believe Piedmont Lithium is more attractive than MP Materials.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MP Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than MP Materials quarterly revenues of $62.9M. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is higher than MP Materials's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MP Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.60x versus 14.93x for MP Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of --. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Rare Element Resources's return on equity of --.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $22.92, signalling upside risk potential of 161.91%. On the other hand Rare Element Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 695.17%. Given that Rare Element Resources has higher upside potential than Piedmont Lithium, analysts believe Rare Element Resources is more attractive than Piedmont Lithium.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.41%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are larger than Rare Element Resources quarterly revenues of --. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is higher than Rare Element Resources's net income of --. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rare Element Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.60x versus -- for Rare Element Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.