PGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California BanCorp has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of -43.2%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat California BanCorp's return on equity of -2.1%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.87%. On the other hand California BanCorp has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that California BanCorp has higher upside potential than Peapack Gladstone Financial, analysts believe California BanCorp is more attractive than Peapack Gladstone Financial.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California BanCorp has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.236%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. California BanCorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. California BanCorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peapack Gladstone Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than California BanCorp quarterly revenues of $38.1M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is higher than California BanCorp's net income of -$16.5M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.97x while California BanCorp's PE ratio is 16.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.67x versus 3.37x for California BanCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of 31.58%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.87%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 11.89%. Given that Peapack Gladstone Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Peapack Gladstone Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is lower than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.97x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.67x versus 3.17x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Community West Bancshares has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat Community West Bancshares's return on equity of 2.54%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.87%. On the other hand Community West Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $23.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.54%. Given that Community West Bancshares has higher upside potential than Peapack Gladstone Financial, analysts believe Community West Bancshares is more attractive than Peapack Gladstone Financial.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community West Bancshares has a beta of 0.905, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.52%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Community West Bancshares offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Community West Bancshares pays out 22.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are larger than Community West Bancshares quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is higher than Community West Bancshares's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.97x while Community West Bancshares's PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.67x versus 2.91x for Community West Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Firstsun Capital Bancorp has a net margin of 13.66% compared to Peapack Gladstone Financial's net margin of 22.83%. Peapack Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 5.54% beat Firstsun Capital Bancorp's return on equity of 8.83%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.87%. On the other hand Firstsun Capital Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.5%. Given that Peapack Gladstone Financial has higher upside potential than Firstsun Capital Bancorp, analysts believe Peapack Gladstone Financial is more attractive than Firstsun Capital Bancorp.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Firstsun Capital Bancorp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Peapack Gladstone Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Firstsun Capital Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peapack Gladstone Financial pays 7.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Firstsun Capital Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peapack Gladstone Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peapack Gladstone Financial quarterly revenues are $55.6M, which are smaller than Firstsun Capital Bancorp quarterly revenues of $98.2M. Peapack Gladstone Financial's net income of $7.6M is lower than Firstsun Capital Bancorp's net income of $22.4M. Notably, Peapack Gladstone Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.97x while Firstsun Capital Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peapack Gladstone Financial is 2.67x versus 2.89x for Firstsun Capital Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.