OPRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Otello Corp ASA has a net margin of 14.56% compared to Opera's net margin of --. Opera's return on equity of 17.82% beat Otello Corp ASA's return on equity of --.

Opera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 151.74%. On the other hand Otello Corp ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than Otello Corp ASA, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than Otello Corp ASA.

Opera has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otello Corp ASA has a beta of -3,359.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 336096.874%.

Opera has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Otello Corp ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Opera pays 15.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Otello Corp ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Opera quarterly revenues are $123.2M, which are larger than Otello Corp ASA quarterly revenues of --. Opera's net income of $17.9M is higher than Otello Corp ASA's net income of --. Notably, Opera's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Otello Corp ASA's PE ratio is 8.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opera is 3.84x versus 256.64x for Otello Corp ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telenor ASA has a net margin of 14.56% compared to Opera's net margin of 16.33%. Opera's return on equity of 17.82% beat Telenor ASA's return on equity of 12.89%.

Opera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 151.74%. On the other hand Telenor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $13.10 which suggests that it could grow by 21.9%. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than Telenor ASA, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than Telenor ASA.

Opera has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telenor ASA has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.859%.

Opera has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Telenor ASA offers a yield of 8.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Opera pays 15.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Telenor ASA pays out 94.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Opera quarterly revenues are $123.2M, which are smaller than Telenor ASA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Opera's net income of $17.9M is lower than Telenor ASA's net income of $304.6M. Notably, Opera's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Telenor ASA's PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opera is 3.84x versus 1.98x for Telenor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

trivago NV has a net margin of 14.56% compared to Opera's net margin of -10.56%. Opera's return on equity of 17.82% beat trivago NV's return on equity of -12.83%.

Opera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 151.74%. On the other hand trivago NV has an analysts' consensus of $2.23 which suggests that it could fall by -3.09%. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than trivago NV, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than trivago NV.

Opera has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison trivago NV has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.466%.

Opera has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. trivago NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share. Opera pays 15.07% of its earnings as a dividend. trivago NV pays out -112.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Opera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Opera quarterly revenues are $123.2M, which are smaller than trivago NV quarterly revenues of $160.7M. Opera's net income of $17.9M is higher than trivago NV's net income of -$17M. Notably, Opera's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while trivago NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opera is 3.84x versus 0.32x for trivago NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VEON has a net margin of 14.56% compared to Opera's net margin of 6.62%. Opera's return on equity of 17.82% beat VEON's return on equity of --.

Opera has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 151.74%. On the other hand VEON has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.56%. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than VEON, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than VEON.

Opera has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VEON has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.443%.

Opera has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. VEON offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Opera pays 15.07% of its earnings as a dividend. VEON pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Opera quarterly revenues are $123.2M, which are smaller than VEON quarterly revenues of $1B. Opera's net income of $17.9M is lower than VEON's net income of $68M. Notably, Opera's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while VEON's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Opera is 3.84x versus 0.66x for VEON. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.