OPAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 16.43%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $5.19, signalling upside risk potential of 164.67%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.51%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.938%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $597.1M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $98.1M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.00x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 1.93x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of -32.93%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $5.19, signalling upside risk potential of 164.67%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $16.86 which suggests that it could grow by 41.66%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than New Fortress Energy, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than New Fortress Energy.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.602%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are smaller than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $679M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.00x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 1.10x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 19.31%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $5.19, signalling upside risk potential of 164.67%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.01%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.455%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.00x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 2.37x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 17.99%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $5.19, signalling upside risk potential of 164.67%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $82.10 which suggests that it could grow by 19.07%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Sempra.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.537%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.00x while Sempra's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 3.34x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.