Financhill
Buy
57

ONEQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$77.68
Seasonality move :
2.29%
Day range:
$76.97 - $78.40
52-week range:
$57.05 - $79.75
Dividend yield:
0.64%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
321.4K
Avg. volume:
279.9K
1-year change:
30.76%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
-- -- -- -- --
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-- -- -- -- --
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
-- -- -- -- --
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
$77.70 -- -- -- $0.17 0.64% --
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
$140.57 -- -- -- $0.28 0.32% --
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
$142.07 -- -- -- $0.25 0.58% --
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
$103.58 -- -- -- $0.13 0.42% --
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
$410.09 -- -- -- $0.43 0.45% --
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
$240.04 -- -- -- $0.25 0.42% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
-- 1.159 -- --
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-- 1.264 -- --
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
-- 1.150 -- --
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
-- 1.123 -- --
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
-- 1.143 -- --
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
-- 1.120 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
-- -- -- -- -- --
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or FTC?

    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- --
    FTC
    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or FTC?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    0 0 0
    FTC
    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is ONEQ or FTC More Risky?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.587%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or FTC?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or FTC?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FTC
    First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IUSG?

    iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- --
    IUSG
    iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IUSG?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    0 0 0
    IUSG
    iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is ONEQ or IUSG More Risky?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.047%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IUSG?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IUSG?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IUSG
    iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IVW?

    iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- --
    IVW
    iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IVW?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    0 0 0
    IVW
    iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is ONEQ or IVW More Risky?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.582%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IVW?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IVW?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IVW
    iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IWF?

    iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell 1000 Growth's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- --
    IWF
    iShares Russell 1000 Growth
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IWF?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell 1000 Growth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell 1000 Growth, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell 1000 Growth.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    0 0 0
    IWF
    iShares Russell 1000 Growth
    0 0 0
  • Is ONEQ or IWF More Risky?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.878%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IWF?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. iShares Russell 1000 Growth offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell 1000 Growth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IWF?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell 1000 Growth quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell 1000 Growth's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell 1000 Growth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell 1000 Growth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IWF
    iShares Russell 1000 Growth
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IWY?

    iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- --
    IWY
    iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IWY?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    0 0 0
    IWY
    iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is ONEQ or IWY More Risky?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.045%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IWY?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IWY?

    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ONEQ
    Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IWY
    iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?

Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…

Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…

How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?

Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x

Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28

Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.

Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.

Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock