MATW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks has a net margin of -0.86% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -5.17%. Matthews International's return on equity of -12.82% beat Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 280.44%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Matthews International.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.067, which suggesting that the stock is 6.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.167%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Harte-Hanks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $401.8M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues of $47.1M. Matthews International's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Harte-Hanks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.37x versus 0.18x for Harte-Hanks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NN has a net margin of -0.86% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -19.69%. Matthews International's return on equity of -12.82% beat NN's return on equity of -27.13%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand NN has an analysts' consensus of $6.67 which suggests that it could grow by 252.73%. Given that NN has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe NN is more attractive than Matthews International.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.067, which suggesting that the stock is 6.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NN has a beta of 2.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.703%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. NN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. NN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $401.8M, which are larger than NN quarterly revenues of $106.5M. Matthews International's net income of -$3.5M is higher than NN's net income of -$21M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while NN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.37x versus 0.20x for NN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -0.86% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -70.61%. Matthews International's return on equity of -12.82% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews International has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Matthews International is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.067, which suggesting that the stock is 6.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.065%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $401.8M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Matthews International's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.37x versus 4.26x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -0.86% compared to Matthews International's net margin of 6.21%. Matthews International's return on equity of -12.82% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews International has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Matthews International is more attractive than Seaboard.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.067, which suggesting that the stock is 6.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.593%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $401.8M, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Matthews International's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Seaboard's net income of $154M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Seaboard's PE ratio is 28.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.37x versus 0.27x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.