Is Okta a Good Stock to Buy?
Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA) is used by some of the largest firms…
Sell
1
MAMO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.58
Seasonality move
:
-17.67%
Day range:
$2.46 - $2.59
52-week range:
$2.42 - $4.66
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
32.46x
P/S ratio:
0.93x
P/B ratio:
4.50x
Volume:
3.5K
Avg. volume:
10.7K
1-year change:
-37.81%
Market cap:
$103.9M
Revenue:
$111.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAMO
Massimo Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PII
Polaris
|
$1.5B | -$0.91 | -11.67% | -81.81% | $51.77 |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$22B | $0.45 | 12.37% | 53.31% | $323.87 |
|
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VIVC
Vivic
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAMO
Massimo Group
|
$2.50 | -- | $103.9M | 32.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.93x |
|
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
|
$0.5900 | -- | $4.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PII
Polaris
|
$36.71 | $51.77 | $2.1B | 18.73x | $0.67 | 7.22% | 0.29x |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$239.43 | $323.87 | $770.1B | 117.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 8.57x |
|
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
|
$0.27 | -- | $4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
|
VIVC
Vivic
|
$0.48 | -- | $12.8M | 45.55x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.15x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAMO
Massimo Group
|
19.4% | 0.000 | 5.23% | 0.65x |
|
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
|
-- | -2.385 | -- | -- |
|
PII
Polaris
|
61.64% | 1.017 | 64.03% | 0.22x |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
9.75% | 2.160 | 0.61% | 1.42x |
|
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
|
2.54% | -0.896 | 6.11% | 2.00x |
|
VIVC
Vivic
|
23.53% | -3.215 | 0.67% | 2.77x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAMO
Massimo Group
|
$5.4M | -$1M | 11.42% | 15.31% | -2.89% | $9.1M |
|
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PII
Polaris
|
$357.9M | $65.8M | 3.23% | 8.17% | 2.65% | $137.3M |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$4.2B | $1.6B | 9.57% | 10.47% | 11.13% | $2B |
|
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
|
-$1.1M | -$4.2M | -41.51% | -42.3% | -217.72% | -$3.6M |
|
VIVC
Vivic
|
$825.6K | $441.4K | 118.91% | 185.07% | 16.19% | $307.6K |
Massimo Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MAMO or LFEV?
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has a net margin of -1.7% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of --. Massimo Group's return on equity of 15.31% beat Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAMOMassimo Group27.13% -$0.01 $28.7M LFEVLife Electric Vehicles Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MAMO or LFEV?
Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Massimo Group has higher upside potential than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings, analysts believe Massimo Group is more attractive than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAMOMassimo Group0 0 0 LFEVLife Electric Vehicles Holdings0 0 0 -
Is MAMO or LFEV More Risky?
Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has a beta of -22.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2323.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or LFEV?
Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Electric Vehicles Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Electric Vehicles Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or LFEV?
Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $20.1M, which are larger than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Massimo Group's net income of -$340.9K is higher than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.93x versus -- for Life Electric Vehicles Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAMOMassimo Group0.93x 32.46x $20.1M -$340.9K LFEVLife Electric Vehicles Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MAMO or PII?
Polaris has a net margin of -1.7% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 0.6%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 15.31% beat Polaris's return on equity of 8.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAMOMassimo Group27.13% -$0.01 $28.7M PIIPolaris20.39% $0.19 $3.4B -
What do Analysts Say About MAMO or PII?
Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $51.77 which suggests that it could grow by 41.02%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Massimo Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAMOMassimo Group0 0 0 PIIPolaris4 12 1 -
Is MAMO or PII More Risky?
Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.843%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or PII?
Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polaris offers a yield of 7.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or PII?
Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $20.1M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Massimo Group's net income of -$340.9K is lower than Polaris's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Polaris's PE ratio is 18.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.93x versus 0.29x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAMOMassimo Group0.93x 32.46x $20.1M -$340.9K PIIPolaris0.29x 18.73x $1.8B $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MAMO or TSLA?
Tesla has a net margin of -1.7% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 9.17%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 15.31% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAMOMassimo Group27.13% -$0.01 $28.7M TSLATesla16.26% $0.66 $81.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MAMO or TSLA?
Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $323.87 which suggests that it could grow by 35.27%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Massimo Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAMOMassimo Group0 0 0 TSLATesla16 14 9 -
Is MAMO or TSLA More Risky?
Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or TSLA?
Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or TSLA?
Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $20.1M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Massimo Group's net income of -$340.9K is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Tesla's PE ratio is 117.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.93x versus 8.57x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAMOMassimo Group0.93x 32.46x $20.1M -$340.9K TSLATesla8.57x 117.37x $25.7B $2.4B
-
Which has Higher Returns MAMO or VEEE?
Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -1.7% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of -207.1%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 15.31% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -42.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAMOMassimo Group27.13% -$0.01 $28.7M VEEETwin Vee PowerCats-57.61% -$0.35 $19.7M -
What do Analysts Say About MAMO or VEEE?
Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2873.98%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Massimo Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAMOMassimo Group0 0 0 VEEETwin Vee PowerCats0 0 0 -
Is MAMO or VEEE More Risky?
Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or VEEE?
Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or VEEE?
Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $20.1M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Massimo Group's net income of -$340.9K is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.93x versus 0.19x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAMOMassimo Group0.93x 32.46x $20.1M -$340.9K VEEETwin Vee PowerCats0.19x -- $1.9M -$3.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns MAMO or VIVC?
Vivic has a net margin of -1.7% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 16.52%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 15.31% beat Vivic's return on equity of 185.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MAMOMassimo Group27.13% -$0.01 $28.7M VIVCVivic32.06% $0.02 $3.4M -
What do Analysts Say About MAMO or VIVC?
Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vivic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Massimo Group has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Massimo Group is more attractive than Vivic.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MAMOMassimo Group0 0 0 VIVCVivic0 0 0 -
Is MAMO or VIVC More Risky?
Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vivic has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or VIVC?
Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vivic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or VIVC?
Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $20.1M, which are larger than Vivic quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Massimo Group's net income of -$340.9K is lower than Vivic's net income of $425.2K. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Vivic's PE ratio is 45.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.93x versus 2.15x for Vivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MAMOMassimo Group0.93x 32.46x $20.1M -$340.9K VIVCVivic2.15x 45.55x $2.6M $425.2K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Fidelity High Dividend ETF a Good Investment Now?
Fidelity’s High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is a fund that offers…
Is Kinder Morgan Dividend Yield Worth It?
Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) is a major energy infrastructure company in…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 5
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 32.59% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 5
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 27.33% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 5
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is up 23.96% over the past day.
