LUNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faro Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of -0.35%. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49%.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 314.63%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.03%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.405%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.6M. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.59x versus 1.42x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of --. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 314.63%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 497.02%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Luna Innovations, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Luna Innovations.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.446%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.59x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of 11.08%. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 314.63%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.82%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than LGL Group.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.4%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 109.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.59x versus 16.02x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of -- compared to Luna Innovations's net margin of 4.64%. Luna Innovations's return on equity of -- beat Trimble's return on equity of 4.79%.

Luna Innovations has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 314.63%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $86.27 which suggests that it could grow by 19.33%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Trimble.

Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.617, which suggesting that the stock is 61.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.609%.

Luna Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luna Innovations pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luna Innovations quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $875.8M. Luna Innovations's net income of -- is lower than Trimble's net income of $40.6M. Notably, Luna Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trimble's PE ratio is 81.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luna Innovations is 0.59x versus 4.78x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.