JG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Infosys has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of 16.28%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -6.95% beat Infosys's return on equity of 32.09%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -33.83%. On the other hand Infosys has an analysts' consensus of $23.65 which suggests that it could grow by 30.93%. Given that Infosys has higher upside potential than Aurora Mobile, analysts believe Infosys is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infosys has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.418%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Infosys offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys pays out 56.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Infosys quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$148.2K is lower than Infosys's net income of $804M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Infosys's PE ratio is 22.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.44x versus 3.93x for Infosys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of -0.49%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -6.95% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -33.83%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.10 which suggests that it could grow by 43.19%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Aurora Mobile, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.116%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$148.2K is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.44x versus 2.32x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wipro has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of 15.03%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -6.95% beat Wipro's return on equity of 15.91%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -33.83%. On the other hand Wipro has an analysts' consensus of $3.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.86%. Given that Wipro has higher upside potential than Aurora Mobile, analysts believe Wipro is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wipro has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.814%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wipro offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wipro pays out 4.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Wipro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Wipro quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$148.2K is lower than Wipro's net income of $397M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wipro's PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.44x versus 3.01x for Wipro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xunlei has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of -11.64%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -6.95% beat Xunlei's return on equity of 0.37%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -33.83%. On the other hand Xunlei has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Mobile has higher upside potential than Xunlei, analysts believe Aurora Mobile is more attractive than Xunlei.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xunlei has a beta of 1.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.831%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xunlei offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xunlei pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Xunlei quarterly revenues of $84M. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$148.2K is higher than Xunlei's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xunlei's PE ratio is 296.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.44x versus 0.91x for Xunlei. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.