IVAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -289.48% compared to Intevac's net margin of -2.72%. Intevac's return on equity of -37.3% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 179.72%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Intevac.

Intevac has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.295%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Intevac's net income of -$32.8M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 26.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.67x versus 0.22x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -289.48% compared to Intevac's net margin of 1.78%. Intevac's return on equity of -37.3% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 429.8%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Intevac.

Intevac has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.09%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Intevac's net income of -$32.8M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.67x versus 0.77x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -289.48% compared to Intevac's net margin of -814.55%. Intevac's return on equity of -37.3% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intevac has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Intevac is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Intevac has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.665%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Intevac's net income of -$32.8M is lower than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.67x versus 8.81x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -289.48% compared to Intevac's net margin of -11.09%. Intevac's return on equity of -37.3% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 342.83%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Intevac.

Intevac has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Intevac's net income of -$32.8M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.67x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.