IRDM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of 29.8%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 13.9% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $39.43, signalling upside risk potential of 40.24%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.12 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Alphabet.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.097%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Iridium Communications pays 420.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $212.8M, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Iridium Communications's net income of $24.4M is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.72x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 25.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 4.39x versus 7.33x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globalstar has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of 13.74%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 13.9% beat Globalstar's return on equity of -7.31%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $39.43, signalling upside risk potential of 40.24%. On the other hand Globalstar has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 56.34%. Given that Globalstar has higher upside potential than Iridium Communications, analysts believe Globalstar is more attractive than Iridium Communications.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globalstar has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.494%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Globalstar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iridium Communications pays 420.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Globalstar pays out -48.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $212.8M, which are larger than Globalstar quarterly revenues of $72.3M. Iridium Communications's net income of $24.4M is higher than Globalstar's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.72x while Globalstar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 4.39x versus 16.65x for Globalstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of 38.65%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 13.9% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $39.43, signalling upside risk potential of 40.24%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $654.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.786%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Iridium Communications pays 420.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $212.8M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $40.6B. Iridium Communications's net income of $24.4M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.72x while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 28.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 4.39x versus 10.12x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T-Mobile US has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of 15.17%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 13.9% beat T-Mobile US's return on equity of 16.29%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $39.43, signalling upside risk potential of 40.24%. On the other hand T-Mobile US has an analysts' consensus of $245.07 which suggests that it could grow by 9.56%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than T-Mobile US, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than T-Mobile US.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.841%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. T-Mobile US offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Iridium Communications pays 420.2% of its earnings as a dividend. T-Mobile US pays out 8.98% of its earnings as a dividend. T-Mobile US's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Iridium Communications's is not.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $212.8M, which are smaller than T-Mobile US quarterly revenues of $20.2B. Iridium Communications's net income of $24.4M is lower than T-Mobile US's net income of $3.1B. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.72x while T-Mobile US's PE ratio is 25.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 4.39x versus 3.31x for T-Mobile US. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.