How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Sell
45
IBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.37
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$22.28 - $22.37
52-week range:
$22.00 - $26.08
Dividend yield:
1.35%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
107
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
$22.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.35% | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
$20.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.94% | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
$35.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.83% | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
$9.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.32% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$101.93 | -- | -- | -- | $1.62 | 1.59% | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
$11.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.1% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | 1.273 | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | 2.388 | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | 1.626 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.363 | -- | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.028 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WNDY
Global X Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or OCEN?
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or OCEN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or OCEN More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or OCEN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. NYLI Clean Oceans ETF offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI Clean Oceans ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or OCEN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for NYLI Clean Oceans ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or QCLN?
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or QCLN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or QCLN More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has a beta of 1.610, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.005%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or QCLN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or QCLN?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or RAYS?
Global X Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or RAYS?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Solar ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or RAYS More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Solar ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or RAYS?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Global X Solar ETF offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or RAYS?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- RAYSGlobal X Solar ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or SMOG More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or SMOG?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBAT or WNDY?
Global X Wind Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net margin of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Wind Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- WNDYGlobal X Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBAT or WNDY?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Wind Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Wind Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Wind Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 WNDYGlobal X Wind Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is IBAT or WNDY More Risky?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Wind Energy ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBAT or WNDY?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Global X Wind Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Wind Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBAT or WNDY?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Wind Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Wind Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Wind Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Wind Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -- WNDYGlobal X Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
60
QMCO alert for Dec 26
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
53
ARQQ alert for Dec 26
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.
