GWRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American States Water has a net margin of 20.43% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 22.15%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 13.42% beat American States Water's return on equity of 13.7%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.80, signalling upside risk potential of 45.71%. On the other hand American States Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than American States Water, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than American States Water.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American States Water has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.132%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. American States Water offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Global Water Resources pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water pays out 48.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are smaller than American States Water quarterly revenues of $161.8M. Global Water Resources's net income of $2.9M is lower than American States Water's net income of $35.8M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.70x while American States Water's PE ratio is 25.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 5.40x versus 4.95x for American States Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadiz has a net margin of 20.43% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of -210.7%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 13.42% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -84.84%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.80, signalling upside risk potential of 45.71%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 195.86%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Global Water Resources, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Global Water Resources.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.768%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Water Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Global Water Resources's net income of $2.9M is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.70x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 5.40x versus 61.64x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 20.43% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 25.99%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 13.42% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.58%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.80, signalling upside risk potential of 45.71%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.97%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Middlesex Water, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Middlesex Water.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.542%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Global Water Resources pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 71.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $55.1M. Global Water Resources's net income of $2.9M is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.70x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 22.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 5.40x versus 5.03x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 20.43% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 52.59%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 13.42% beat Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.49%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.80, signalling upside risk potential of 45.71%. On the other hand Pure Cycle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -47.35%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.611%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Pure Cycle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Cycle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Water Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $14.3M, which are larger than Pure Cycle quarterly revenues of $12.6M. Global Water Resources's net income of $2.9M is lower than Pure Cycle's net income of $6.6M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.70x while Pure Cycle's PE ratio is 25.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 5.40x versus 10.45x for Pure Cycle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.