Financhill
Sell
47

GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$3.78
Seasonality move :
9.24%
Day range:
$3.73 - $3.81
52-week range:
$3.72 - $6.73
Dividend yield:
1.38%
P/E ratio:
15.75x
P/S ratio:
0.43x
P/B ratio:
0.89x
Volume:
869K
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-43.83%
Market cap:
$710.2M
Revenue:
$1.7B
EPS (TTM):
$0.24

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
$443.5M $0.21 4.54% -66.67% --
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
-- -- -- -- --
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
-- -- -- -- --
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
-- -- -- -- --
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
$10.6B $1.96 -2.78% 123.66% $93.86
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
-- -- -- -- $82.20
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
$3.78 -- $710.2M 15.75x $0.01 1.38% 0.43x
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
$0.05 -- $26.7M -- $0.00 0% 5.41x
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
$2.6600 -- $550.3M 55.37x $0.01 1.46% 1.37x
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
$1.45 -- $571.2M 63.63x $0.02 4.46% 1.27x
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
$74.14 $93.86 $24.1B 11.28x $1.34 7.11% 0.59x
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
$59.01 $82.20 $95.8B 8.96x $1.77 7.37% 1.78x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
8.7% 0.567 8.68% 0.90x
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
-- 0.284 -- 3.53x
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
34.09% 0.075 40.25% 0.69x
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
26.8% 1.096 32.06% 0.51x
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
45.08% 0.530 36.01% 1.10x
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
18.91% -0.225 11.82% 1.16x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
$159.6M $40.6M 4.42% 4.65% 7.85% -$10M
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
-- -- -14.46% -14.46% -- --
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
-- -- 2.59% 3.76% -- --
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
-- -- 1.37% 1.8% -- --
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
$1.2B $807M 8.76% 16.1% 8.03% $302M
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
-- -- 15.69% 19.33% -- --

Ferroglobe PLC vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GSM or EDNSF?

    Eden Research PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Eden Research PLC's return on equity of -14.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    36.81% $0.10 $869.6M
    EDNSF
    Eden Research PLC
    -- -- $16.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About GSM or EDNSF?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Eden Research PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Eden Research PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Eden Research PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0 0 0
    EDNSF
    Eden Research PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is GSM or EDNSF More Risky?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eden Research PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or EDNSF?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Eden Research PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eden Research PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or EDNSF?

    Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Eden Research PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Eden Research PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Eden Research PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.43x versus 5.41x for Eden Research PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0.43x 15.75x $433.5M $18.8M
    EDNSF
    Eden Research PLC
    5.41x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GSM or FTTRF?

    Forterra PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Forterra PLC's return on equity of 3.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    36.81% $0.10 $869.6M
    FTTRF
    Forterra PLC
    -- -- $417.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About GSM or FTTRF?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Forterra PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Forterra PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Forterra PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0 0 0
    FTTRF
    Forterra PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is GSM or FTTRF More Risky?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forterra PLC has a beta of 1,260.713, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125971.325%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or FTTRF?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Forterra PLC offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forterra PLC pays out 200.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or FTTRF?

    Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Forterra PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Forterra PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Forterra PLC's PE ratio is 55.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.43x versus 1.37x for Forterra PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0.43x 15.75x $433.5M $18.8M
    FTTRF
    Forterra PLC
    1.37x 55.37x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GSM or IBJHF?

    Ibstock PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Ibstock PLC's return on equity of 1.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    36.81% $0.10 $869.6M
    IBJHF
    Ibstock PLC
    -- -- $681.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About GSM or IBJHF?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Ibstock PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Ibstock PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Ibstock PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0 0 0
    IBJHF
    Ibstock PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is GSM or IBJHF More Risky?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibstock PLC has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.527%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or IBJHF?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Ibstock PLC offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ibstock PLC pays out 165.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or IBJHF?

    Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Ibstock PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Ibstock PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Ibstock PLC's PE ratio is 63.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.43x versus 1.27x for Ibstock PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0.43x 15.75x $433.5M $18.8M
    IBJHF
    Ibstock PLC
    1.27x 63.63x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GSM or LYB?

    LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 5.52%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 16.1%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    36.81% $0.10 $869.6M
    LYB
    LyondellBasell Industries NV
    12.03% $1.75 $25.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About GSM or LYB?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $93.86 which suggests that it could grow by 26.6%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than LyondellBasell Industries NV, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than LyondellBasell Industries NV.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0 0 0
    LYB
    LyondellBasell Industries NV
    4 12 1
  • Is GSM or LYB More Risky?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.664%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or LYB?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 7.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 76.16% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or LYB?

    Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $10.3B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is lower than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of $570M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 11.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.43x versus 0.59x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0.43x 15.75x $433.5M $18.8M
    LYB
    LyondellBasell Industries NV
    0.59x 11.28x $10.3B $570M
  • Which has Higher Returns GSM or RIO?

    Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 19.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    36.81% $0.10 $869.6M
    RIO
    Rio Tinto PLC
    -- -- $70B
  • What do Analysts Say About GSM or RIO?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 39.3%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Rio Tinto PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Rio Tinto PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0 0 0
    RIO
    Rio Tinto PLC
    5 0 0
  • Is GSM or RIO More Risky?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.849%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or RIO?

    Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 64.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or RIO?

    Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.43x versus 1.78x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSM
    Ferroglobe PLC
    0.43x 15.75x $433.5M $18.8M
    RIO
    Rio Tinto PLC
    1.78x 8.96x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is Coinbase Stock Going Down?
Why Is Coinbase Stock Going Down?

Every way you look at it, Coinbase has had a…

Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?

Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…

Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x

Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28

Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.

Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.

Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock