NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Buy
80
ESOA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.21
Seasonality move
:
11.57%
Day range:
$15.16 - $16.43
52-week range:
$5.01 - $19.83
Dividend yield:
0.19%
P/E ratio:
10.60x
P/S ratio:
0.75x
P/B ratio:
4.53x
Volume:
273.9K
Avg. volume:
298.1K
1-year change:
209.48%
Market cap:
$266M
Revenue:
$351.9M
EPS (TTM):
$1.51
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$94.5M | -- | -5.39% | -- | -- |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$225.6M | $1.26 | 20.02% | 28.65% | -- |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$1.2B | $2.31 | 7.5% | 19.54% | $218.75 |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$3.4B | $1.23 | 1.25% | 12659.8% | $154.43 |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$917.2M | $0.40 | -9.68% | -49.65% | $181.3333 |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$120.1M | -$0.13 | -13.88% | -48.21% | $3.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$16.00 | -- | $266M | 10.60x | $0.03 | 0.19% | 0.75x |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$139.33 | -- | $1.9B | 29.15x | $0.38 | 0.92% | 2.38x |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$173.76 | $218.75 | $5.1B | 22.86x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.12x |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$136.56 | $154.43 | $10.8B | 121.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.88x |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$153.3400 | $181.3333 | $2.5B | 66.96x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.72x |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$2.43 | $3.00 | $82.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
36.58% | 2.434 | 21.51% | 1.43x |
|
AGX
Argan
|
-- | -1.372 | -- | 1.61x |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
47.09% | 2.125 | 21.58% | 2.86x |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
45.27% | 2.986 | 23.78% | 1.14x |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
13.67% | 0.632 | 5.65% | 1.32x |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
97.24% | 0.707 | 47.97% | 0.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$17.6M | $8.8M | 30.58% | 58.24% | 8.38% | -$2.9M |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$44.3M | $30.3M | 21.95% | 21.95% | 11.8% | $29.2M |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$264.6M | $101.8M | 10.93% | 20.08% | 8.55% | -$8.8M |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$463.2M | $179.7M | 1.61% | 3.24% | 5.66% | $234.1M |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$77.3M | $18.6M | 5.58% | 6.06% | 2.31% | $18M |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$12.2M | -$796K | -136.39% | -290.81% | 0.25% | $10.3M |
Energy Services of America vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or AGX?
Argan has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 10.9%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 58.24% beat Argan's return on equity of 21.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America16.79% $0.40 $92.5M AGXArgan17.25% $2.00 $328.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Argan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.66%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Argan, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Argan.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America0 0 0 AGXArgan0 0 0 -
Is ESOA or AGX More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argan has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.685%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Argan offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Argan pays out 45.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $104.7M, which are smaller than Argan quarterly revenues of $257M. Energy Services of America's net income of $6.7M is lower than Argan's net income of $28M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while Argan's PE ratio is 29.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.75x versus 2.38x for Argan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.75x 10.60x $104.7M $6.7M AGXArgan2.38x 29.15x $257M $28M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or DY?
Dycom Industries has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 5.49%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 58.24% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 20.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America16.79% $0.40 $92.5M DYDycom Industries20.8% $2.37 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $218.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25.89%. Given that Dycom Industries has higher upside potential than Energy Services of America, analysts believe Dycom Industries is more attractive than Energy Services of America.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America0 0 0 DYDycom Industries8 0 0 -
Is ESOA or DY More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.075%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $104.7M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Energy Services of America's net income of $6.7M is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $69.8M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 22.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.75x versus 1.12x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.75x 10.60x $104.7M $6.7M DYDycom Industries1.12x 22.86x $1.3B $69.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or MTZ?
MasTec has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 2.93%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 58.24% beat MasTec's return on equity of 3.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America16.79% $0.40 $92.5M MTZMasTec14.24% $1.21 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $154.43 which suggests that it could grow by 13.09%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than MasTec.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America0 0 0 MTZMasTec9 2 0 -
Is ESOA or MTZ More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.458%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $104.7M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Energy Services of America's net income of $6.7M is lower than MasTec's net income of $95.2M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while MasTec's PE ratio is 121.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.75x versus 0.88x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.75x 10.60x $104.7M $6.7M MTZMasTec0.88x 121.93x $3.3B $95.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or MYRG?
MYR Group has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 1.2%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 58.24% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 6.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America16.79% $0.40 $92.5M MYRGMYR Group8.7% $0.65 $681.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $181.3333 which suggests that it could grow by 18.26%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than MYR Group, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than MYR Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America0 0 0 MYRGMYR Group2 2 0 -
Is ESOA or MYRG More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.639%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $104.7M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $888M. Energy Services of America's net income of $6.7M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while MYR Group's PE ratio is 66.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.75x versus 0.72x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.75x 10.60x $104.7M $6.7M MYRGMYR Group0.72x 66.96x $888M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or SHIM?
Shimmick has a net margin of 6.36% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of -0.94%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 58.24% beat Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America16.79% $0.40 $92.5M SHIMShimmick7.34% -$0.05 $40.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Shimmick has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.45%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Shimmick.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America0 0 0 SHIMShimmick0 2 0 -
Is ESOA or SHIM More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.153% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Shimmick offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Shimmick pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $104.7M, which are smaller than Shimmick quarterly revenues of $166M. Energy Services of America's net income of $6.7M is higher than Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while Shimmick's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.75x versus 0.13x for Shimmick. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.75x 10.60x $104.7M $6.7M SHIMShimmick0.13x -- $166M -$1.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is down 2.64% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 3.83% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.99% over the past day.
