Is Fidelity High Dividend ETF a Good Investment Now?
Fidelity’s High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is a fund that offers…
Sell
25
ESOA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.32
Seasonality move
:
0.61%
Day range:
$8.02 - $9.13
52-week range:
$5.70 - $19.83
Dividend yield:
0.72%
P/E ratio:
5.79x
P/S ratio:
0.38x
P/B ratio:
2.29x
Volume:
532.2K
Avg. volume:
238.6K
1-year change:
2.27%
Market cap:
$139.8M
Revenue:
$351.9M
EPS (TTM):
$1.44
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$80M | -- | 12.47% | -- | $20.00 |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$197.5M | $1.15 | 22.87% | 87.93% | $150.00 |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$1B | $0.90 | 3.83% | -23.47% | $213.13 |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$2.7B | $0.34 | 0.94% | 12099.5% | $168.33 |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$789M | $1.17 | -4.1% | 1.34% | $154.0000 |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$94.4M | -$0.25 | -21.4% | -80.77% | $3.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$8.34 | $20.00 | $139.8M | 5.79x | $0.03 | 0.72% | 0.38x |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$120.08 | $150.00 | $1.6B | 19.65x | $0.38 | 1.12% | 1.91x |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$138.96 | $213.13 | $4B | 17.55x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.87x |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$106.07 | $168.33 | $8.4B | 51.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.68x |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$105.2900 | $154.0000 | $1.7B | 56.91x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.52x |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
$1.33 | $3.00 | $45.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.08x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
49.41% | 3.136 | 28.28% | 1.46x |
|
AGX
Argan
|
-- | 0.838 | -- | 1.59x |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
43.22% | 1.901 | 17.21% | 2.61x |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
43.31% | 2.456 | 20.46% | 1.11x |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
11.02% | 0.455 | 3.1% | 1.30x |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
-37.86% | 0.819 | 10.85% | 0.54x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESOA
Energy Services of America
|
$10.3M | $1.6M | 26.47% | 49.42% | 1.78% | $6M |
|
AGX
Argan
|
$47.6M | $32.7M | 27.17% | 27.17% | 14.05% | $43.3M |
|
DY
Dycom Industries
|
$196.6M | $53.7M | 11.2% | 20.24% | 5.56% | $259.7M |
|
MTZ
MasTec
|
$436.5M | $138.3M | 3.03% | 5.83% | 4.12% | $423.4M |
|
MYRG
MYR Group
|
$85.9M | $28M | 4.42% | 4.82% | 3.52% | $8.8M |
|
SHIM
Shimmick
|
-$20.8M | -$36.9M | -246.15% | -827.87% | -37.05% | $44.4M |
Energy Services of America vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or AGX?
Argan has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 13.49%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42% beat Argan's return on equity of 27.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America10.2% $0.05 $120.7M AGXArgan20.48% $2.22 $351.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.81%. On the other hand Argan has an analysts' consensus of $150.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.92%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Argan, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Argan.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 AGXArgan1 1 0 -
Is ESOA or AGX More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argan has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Argan offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Argan pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or AGX?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $100.6M, which are smaller than Argan quarterly revenues of $232.5M. Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K is lower than Argan's net income of $31.4M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.79x while Argan's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.38x versus 1.91x for Argan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.38x 5.79x $100.6M $853.7K AGXArgan1.91x 19.65x $232.5M $31.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or DY?
Dycom Industries has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 3.01%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 20.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America10.2% $0.05 $120.7M DYDycom Industries18.13% $1.11 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.81%. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $213.13 which suggests that it could grow by 53.37%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Dycom Industries, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Dycom Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 DYDycom Industries8 0 0 -
Is ESOA or DY More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.998%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or DY?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $100.6M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.79x while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 17.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.38x versus 0.87x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.38x 5.79x $100.6M $853.7K DYDycom Industries0.87x 17.55x $1.1B $32.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or MTZ?
MasTec has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 2.2%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42% beat MasTec's return on equity of 5.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America10.2% $0.05 $120.7M MTZMasTec12.83% $0.95 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.81%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $168.33 which suggests that it could grow by 58.7%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than MasTec.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 MTZMasTec10 4 0 -
Is ESOA or MTZ More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.444%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or MTZ?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $100.6M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K is lower than MasTec's net income of $74.7M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.79x while MasTec's PE ratio is 51.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.38x versus 0.68x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.38x 5.79x $100.6M $853.7K MTZMasTec0.68x 51.49x $3.4B $74.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or MYRG?
MYR Group has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of 1.92%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 4.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America10.2% $0.05 $120.7M MYRGMYR Group10.36% $0.99 $674.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.81%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $154.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 46.26%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than MYR Group, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than MYR Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 MYRGMYR Group4 0 0 -
Is ESOA or MYRG More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.113%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or MYRG?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $100.6M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $829.8M. Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K is lower than MYR Group's net income of $16M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.79x while MYR Group's PE ratio is 56.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.38x versus 0.52x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.38x 5.79x $100.6M $853.7K MYRGMYR Group0.52x 56.91x $829.8M $16M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESOA or SHIM?
Shimmick has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Energy Services of America's net margin of -37.14%. Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42% beat Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESOAEnergy Services of America10.2% $0.05 $120.7M SHIMShimmick-20.13% -$1.13 -$25.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 139.81%. On the other hand Shimmick has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 106.77%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Shimmick.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESOAEnergy Services of America1 0 0 SHIMShimmick0 2 0 -
Is ESOA or SHIM More Risky?
Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.686% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Shimmick offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Services of America pays 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Shimmick pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESOA or SHIM?
Energy Services of America quarterly revenues are $100.6M, which are smaller than Shimmick quarterly revenues of $103.6M. Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K is higher than Shimmick's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Energy Services of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.79x while Shimmick's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Services of America is 0.38x versus 0.08x for Shimmick. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESOAEnergy Services of America0.38x 5.79x $100.6M $853.7K SHIMShimmick0.08x -- $103.6M -$38.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Kinder Morgan Dividend Yield Worth It?
Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) is a major energy infrastructure company in…
What Is the Best ETF to Buy This Year?
The stock market has gotten off to an extremely rough…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 5
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 32.59% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 5
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 27.33% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 5
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is up 23.96% over the past day.
