CPSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -8.56%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -4.31%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.98%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.806, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.369%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.6M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$392.9K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.01x versus 3.03x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 0.54%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.28 which suggests that it could grow by 241.64%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.144%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.01x versus 0.62x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of --. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.03%. Given that Marti Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Marti Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.01x versus 9.70x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -24.55% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -1.23%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -11.95% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 77.6%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.167% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.803, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.295%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$1M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.01x versus 0.25x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.