CNXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CSP has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Concentrix's net margin of 3.01%. Concentrix's return on equity of 6.59% beat CSP's return on equity of 0.46%.

Concentrix has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.67%. On the other hand CSP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concentrix has higher upside potential than CSP, analysts believe Concentrix is more attractive than CSP.

Concentrix has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSP has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.961%.

Concentrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. CSP offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Concentrix pays 33.36% of its earnings as a dividend. CSP pays out -312.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concentrix quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than CSP quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Concentrix's net income of $70.3M is higher than CSP's net income of $472K. Notably, Concentrix's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.59x while CSP's PE ratio is 1,562.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concentrix is 0.37x versus 2.62x for CSP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Concentrix's net margin of -1.26%. Concentrix's return on equity of 6.59% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Concentrix has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.67%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.55%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Concentrix, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Concentrix.

Concentrix has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Concentrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Concentrix pays 33.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concentrix quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Concentrix's net income of $70.3M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Concentrix's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.59x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concentrix is 0.37x versus 3.43x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Concentrix's net margin of -2893.73%. Concentrix's return on equity of 6.59% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Concentrix has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.67%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concentrix has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Concentrix is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Concentrix has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Concentrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Concentrix pays 33.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concentrix quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Concentrix's net income of $70.3M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Concentrix's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.59x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concentrix is 0.37x versus 0.44x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Concentrix's net margin of -1.23%. Concentrix's return on equity of 6.59% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Concentrix has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.67%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 100%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Concentrix, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Concentrix.

Concentrix has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Concentrix has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Concentrix pays 33.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concentrix quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Concentrix's net income of $70.3M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Concentrix's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.59x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concentrix is 0.37x versus 0.22x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.