CNDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -1.5% compared to Conduent's net margin of -26.62%. Conduent's return on equity of 55.8% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Conduent has a consensus price target of $7.03, signalling upside risk potential of 153%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Castellum.

Conduent has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 438.042%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $800M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Conduent's net income of -$12M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.29x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.16x versus 1.30x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of -1.5% compared to Conduent's net margin of 0.57%. Conduent's return on equity of 55.8% beat Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61%.

Conduent has a consensus price target of $7.03, signalling upside risk potential of 153%. On the other hand Diebold Nixdorf has an analysts' consensus of $70.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.81%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf.

Conduent has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diebold Nixdorf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Diebold Nixdorf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $800M, which are smaller than Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues of $988.9M. Conduent's net income of -$12M is lower than Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.29x while Diebold Nixdorf's PE ratio is 356.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.16x versus 0.44x for Diebold Nixdorf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ExlService Holdings has a net margin of -1.5% compared to Conduent's net margin of 10.53%. Conduent's return on equity of 55.8% beat ExlService Holdings's return on equity of 22.62%.

Conduent has a consensus price target of $7.03, signalling upside risk potential of 153%. On the other hand ExlService Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than ExlService Holdings, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than ExlService Holdings.

Conduent has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ExlService Holdings has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.628%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ExlService Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. ExlService Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $800M, which are larger than ExlService Holdings quarterly revenues of $481.4M. Conduent's net income of -$12M is lower than ExlService Holdings's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.29x while ExlService Holdings's PE ratio is 38.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.16x versus 4.18x for ExlService Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of -1.5% compared to Conduent's net margin of --. Conduent's return on equity of 55.8% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Conduent has a consensus price target of $7.03, signalling upside risk potential of 153%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.06%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Conduent has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduent pays 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduent quarterly revenues are $800M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Conduent's net income of -$12M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Conduent's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.29x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduent is 0.16x versus 9.39x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.