CLPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Infobird has a net margin of -- compared to CLPS's net margin of --. CLPS's return on equity of -3.58% beat Infobird's return on equity of 2.83%.

CLPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Infobird has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2277525.57%. Given that Infobird has higher upside potential than CLPS, analysts believe Infobird is more attractive than CLPS.

CLPS has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infobird has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CLPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Infobird offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLPS pays -109.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Infobird pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CLPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Infobird quarterly revenues of --. CLPS's net income of -- is lower than Infobird's net income of --. Notably, CLPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Infobird's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLPS is 0.20x versus 4.91x for Infobird. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triller has a net margin of -- compared to CLPS's net margin of --. CLPS's return on equity of -3.58% beat Triller's return on equity of --.

CLPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Triller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLPS has higher upside potential than Triller, analysts believe CLPS is more attractive than Triller.

CLPS has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triller has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CLPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triller offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLPS pays -109.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Triller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CLPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Triller quarterly revenues of --. CLPS's net income of -- is lower than Triller's net income of --. Notably, CLPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Triller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLPS is 0.20x versus -- for Triller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MMTEC has a net margin of -- compared to CLPS's net margin of --. CLPS's return on equity of -3.58% beat MMTEC's return on equity of --.

CLPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MMTEC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLPS has higher upside potential than MMTEC, analysts believe CLPS is more attractive than MMTEC.

CLPS has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MMTEC has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.041%.

CLPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MMTEC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLPS pays -109.64% of its earnings as a dividend. MMTEC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CLPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MMTEC quarterly revenues of --. CLPS's net income of -- is lower than MMTEC's net income of --. Notably, CLPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MMTEC's PE ratio is 1.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLPS is 0.20x versus 35.75x for MMTEC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TROOPS has a net margin of -- compared to CLPS's net margin of --. CLPS's return on equity of -3.58% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.

CLPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLPS has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe CLPS is more attractive than TROOPS.

CLPS has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.121%.

CLPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLPS pays -109.64% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CLPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. CLPS's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, CLPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLPS is 0.20x versus 42.33x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.