Will Uber Stock Recover?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…
Sell
30
CATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$70.31
Seasonality move
:
1.8%
Day range:
$69.96 - $70.77
52-week range:
$57.29 - $73.91
Dividend yield:
0.96%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
31.7K
Avg. volume:
56.8K
1-year change:
20.93%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
$70.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 0.96% | -- |
|
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
|
$53.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.58% | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
$70.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 1.15% | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
$39.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.9% | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
$103.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.09% | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
|
$54.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | 1.043 | -- | -- |
|
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
|
-- | 0.901 | -- | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.055 | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | 0.947 | -- | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.075 | -- | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.077 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or HLAL?
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or HLAL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or HLAL More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.164%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or HLAL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or HLAL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or JHML?
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- JHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or JHML?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 JHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or JHML More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or JHML?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or JHML?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- JHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or KRMA?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or KRMA?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Conscious Companies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Conscious Companies ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than Global X Conscious Companies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or KRMA More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.146%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or KRMA?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. Global X Conscious Companies ETF offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or KRMA?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Conscious Companies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Conscious Companies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or SUSL?
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- SUSLiShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or SUSL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 SUSLiShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or SUSL More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.075%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or SUSL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or SUSL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- SUSLiShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or USSG?
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- USSGXtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or USSG?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 USSGXtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or USSG More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.35400000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or USSG?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.96%. Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or USSG?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- USSGXtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 11
IonQ [IONQ] is up 7.07% over the past day.
Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
2
CRNX alert for Jan 11
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals [CRNX] is down 16.31% over the past day.
