BOKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 27.38%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $106.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.609%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.95x versus 2.97x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 20.42%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $106.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than BOK Financial, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than BOK Financial.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.95x versus 3.10x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 28.72%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $106.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.05%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Park National.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Park National offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Park National's PE ratio is 15.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.95x versus 4.61x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 25.81%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $106.60, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.18%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than BOK Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than BOK Financial.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.95x versus 2.86x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.