Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
46
BJK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.87
Seasonality move
:
0.35%
Day range:
$40.50 - $40.87
52-week range:
$37.24 - $45.54
Dividend yield:
2.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
6.3K
Avg. volume:
3.5K
1-year change:
-3.6%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
$40.68 | -- | -- | -- | $1.17 | 2.87% | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
$21.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.28% | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
$19.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
$66.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
$53.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.4% | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
$101.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.38% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.292 | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.260 | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | 1.170 | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | 1.892 | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | 0.982 | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | 2.051 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AWAY
Amplify Travel Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEJ
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Gaming ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or AWAY?
Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Travel Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or AWAY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Travel Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Travel Tech ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Amplify Travel Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or AWAY More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Travel Tech ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or AWAY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Amplify Travel Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Travel Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or AWAY?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Travel Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Travel Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Travel Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Travel Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- AWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or BETZ?
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or BETZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or BETZ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or BETZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or BETZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- BETZRoundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or IBUY?
Amplify Online Retail ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Online Retail ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or IBUY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Online Retail ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Online Retail ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Amplify Online Retail ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or IBUY More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Online Retail ETF has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.47%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or IBUY?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Amplify Online Retail ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Online Retail ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or IBUY?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Online Retail ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Online Retail ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Online Retail ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Online Retail ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- IBUYAmplify Online Retail ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEJ?
Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEJ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.932%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEJ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEJInvesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BJK or PEZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Gaming ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Gaming ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF, analysts believe VanEck Gaming ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BJKVanEck Gaming ETF0 0 0 PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF0 0 0 -
Is BJK or PEZ More Risky?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a beta of 1.367, which suggesting that the stock is 36.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.435%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. VanEck Gaming ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BJK or PEZ?
VanEck Gaming ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Gaming ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Gaming ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Gaming ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BJKVanEck Gaming ETF-- -- -- -- PEZInvesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Mo ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 0.06% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 4.31% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 2.29% over the past day.
