BIRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caleres has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 5.59%. Allbirds's return on equity of -72.91% beat Caleres's return on equity of 27.41%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.85%. On the other hand Caleres has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.58%. Given that Allbirds has higher upside potential than Caleres, analysts believe Allbirds is more attractive than Caleres.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caleres has a beta of 1.917, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.658%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caleres offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caleres pays out 5.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Caleres's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $43M, which are smaller than Caleres quarterly revenues of $740.9M. Allbirds's net income of -$21.2M is lower than Caleres's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Caleres's PE ratio is 5.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.27x versus 0.29x for Caleres. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foot Locker has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Allbirds's net margin of -1.68%. Allbirds's return on equity of -72.91% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of -14.45%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.85%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $23.88 which suggests that it could grow by 6.54%. Given that Allbirds has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Allbirds is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.524%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -34.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $43M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $2B. Allbirds's net income of -$21.2M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of -$33M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foot Locker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.27x versus 0.26x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordstrom has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 1.33%. Allbirds's return on equity of -72.91% beat Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.24%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.85%. On the other hand Nordstrom has an analysts' consensus of $20.72 which suggests that it could fall by -2.47%. Given that Allbirds has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Allbirds is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordstrom has a beta of 2.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.165%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordstrom offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom pays out 91.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $43M, which are smaller than Nordstrom quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Allbirds's net income of -$21.2M is lower than Nordstrom's net income of $46M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nordstrom's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.27x versus 0.27x for Nordstrom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 6.27%. Allbirds's return on equity of -72.91% beat Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 12.42%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.85%. On the other hand Shoe Carnival has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.41%. Given that Allbirds has higher upside potential than Shoe Carnival, analysts believe Allbirds is more attractive than Shoe Carnival.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.530, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.033%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoe Carnival offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival pays out 16.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $43M, which are smaller than Shoe Carnival quarterly revenues of $306.9M. Allbirds's net income of -$21.2M is lower than Shoe Carnival's net income of $19.2M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shoe Carnival's PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.27x versus 0.78x for Shoe Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.