BAOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheer Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net margin of --. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's return on equity of -8.57% beat Cheer Holding's return on equity of 12.82%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cheer Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2698.51%. Given that Cheer Holding has higher upside potential than Baosheng Media Group Holdings, analysts believe Cheer Holding is more attractive than Baosheng Media Group Holdings.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheer Holding has a beta of -0.333, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.299%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheer Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baosheng Media Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheer Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cheer Holding quarterly revenues of --. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Cheer Holding's net income of --. Notably, Baosheng Media Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cheer Holding's PE ratio is 0.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baosheng Media Group Holdings is 7.89x versus 0.17x for Cheer Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZW Data Action Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net margin of -59.09%. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's return on equity of -8.57% beat ZW Data Action Technologies's return on equity of -81.18%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baosheng Media Group Holdings has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, analysts believe Baosheng Media Group Holdings is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.653%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZW Data Action Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baosheng Media Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ZW Data Action Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net income of -- is lower than ZW Data Action Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Baosheng Media Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZW Data Action Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baosheng Media Group Holdings is 7.89x versus 0.19x for ZW Data Action Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

36KR Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net margin of --. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's return on equity of -8.57% beat 36KR Holdings's return on equity of -44.22%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 36KR Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3764.78%. Given that 36KR Holdings has higher upside potential than Baosheng Media Group Holdings, analysts believe 36KR Holdings is more attractive than Baosheng Media Group Holdings.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 36KR Holdings has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.105%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 36KR Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baosheng Media Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 36KR Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 36KR Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net income of -- is lower than 36KR Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Baosheng Media Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 36KR Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baosheng Media Group Holdings is 7.89x versus 4.81x for 36KR Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WiMi Hologram Cloud has a net margin of -- compared to Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net margin of --. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's return on equity of -8.57% beat WiMi Hologram Cloud's return on equity of -44.29%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WiMi Hologram Cloud has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 442.64%. Given that WiMi Hologram Cloud has higher upside potential than Baosheng Media Group Holdings, analysts believe WiMi Hologram Cloud is more attractive than Baosheng Media Group Holdings.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WiMi Hologram Cloud has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WiMi Hologram Cloud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baosheng Media Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WiMi Hologram Cloud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baosheng Media Group Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WiMi Hologram Cloud quarterly revenues of --. Baosheng Media Group Holdings's net income of -- is lower than WiMi Hologram Cloud's net income of --. Notably, Baosheng Media Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WiMi Hologram Cloud's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baosheng Media Group Holdings is 7.89x versus 1.42x for WiMi Hologram Cloud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.