ALT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -456900% compared to Altimmune's net margin of -49.65%. Altimmune's return on equity of -64.43% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Altimmune has a consensus price target of $21.86, signalling upside risk potential of 215.27%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 479.77%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Altimmune, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Altimmune.

Altimmune has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.372%.

Altimmune has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altimmune pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altimmune quarterly revenues are $5K, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Altimmune's net income of -$22.8M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Altimmune's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altimmune is 9,456.74x versus 0.07x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -456900% compared to Altimmune's net margin of -2357.27%. Altimmune's return on equity of -64.43% beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Altimmune has a consensus price target of $21.86, signalling upside risk potential of 215.27%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1187.88%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Altimmune, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Altimmune.

Altimmune has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.929%.

Altimmune has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altimmune pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altimmune quarterly revenues are $5K, which are smaller than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Altimmune's net income of -$22.8M is lower than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Altimmune's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altimmune is 9,456.74x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cassava Sciences has a net margin of -456900% compared to Altimmune's net margin of --. Altimmune's return on equity of -64.43% beat Cassava Sciences's return on equity of --.

Altimmune has a consensus price target of $21.86, signalling upside risk potential of 215.27%. On the other hand Cassava Sciences has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3845.58%. Given that Cassava Sciences has higher upside potential than Altimmune, analysts believe Cassava Sciences is more attractive than Altimmune.

Altimmune has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 198.512%.

Altimmune has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cassava Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altimmune pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cassava Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altimmune quarterly revenues are $5K, which are larger than Cassava Sciences quarterly revenues of --. Altimmune's net income of -$22.8M is higher than Cassava Sciences's net income of -$27.9M. Notably, Altimmune's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cassava Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altimmune is 9,456.74x versus 3.23x for Cassava Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -456900% compared to Altimmune's net margin of --. Altimmune's return on equity of -64.43% beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Altimmune has a consensus price target of $21.86, signalling upside risk potential of 215.27%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5131.21%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Altimmune, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Altimmune.

Altimmune has a beta of 0.224, which suggesting that the stock is 77.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.367%.

Altimmune has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Altimmune pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Altimmune quarterly revenues are $5K, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Altimmune's net income of -$22.8M is lower than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Altimmune's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Altimmune is 9,456.74x versus 1.59x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.